Alejo Sanchez Quilez vs Raul Brancaccio Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Quilez and Brancaccio's recent second serve performance shows a slight edge for Brancaccio, winning 43.04% of points compared to Quilez's 41.74%.
• In terms of return game stats, Quilez has a slight advantage on second serve returns, winning 47.98% of points against opponents, compared to Brancaccio's 47.36%.
• For first serve return points, Quilez significantly outperforms Brancaccio, winning 34.79% of points compared to Brancaccio's 26.56%.
• Brancaccio has a marginally better breakpoint save percentage of 51.48%, while Quilez saves 49.62% of breakpoints faced.
• Looking at performance over the last year, Brancaccio has a higher win percentage at 59.09%, compared to Quilez's 54.93%.
• Both players perform best on Hard courts, but Brancaccio has a slightly higher win percentage of 62% versus Quilez's 60%.
• When it comes to tournament level, Quilez mostly competes in lower-tier events (Futures/Satellites/ITF), with a 56.36% win rate, whereas Brancaccio participates more in Challengers, holding a 51.43% win rate.
• In their direct head-to-head encounter, Brancaccio leads, having won their sole match in straight sets.
• Quilez faces tougher competition on average, with opponents ranked 326.17 compared to Brancaccio's 439.36 average opponent ranking.
• In deciding sets overall, Quilez boasts a 62% win rate, outshining Brancaccio's 47%.
• Regarding break point conversion, Quilez converts at a higher rate (41.61%) than Brancaccio (34.5%).

Editorial Prediction (May 22, 2025, UTC):

Based on recent performance metrics, Brancaccio has shown slight advantages in second serve points and breakpoint saving ability. These factors could be critical in determining the match outcome.

Quilez, however, exhibits strengths in returning first serve points and converting breakpoints, giving him an edge in capitalizing on opponents’ weaknesses.

Surface preference plays a minor role here, but both players show proficiency on Hard courts, slightly favoring Brancaccio.

Overall, the stronger head-to-head record, combined with slightly more consistent performance in potentially decisive match situations, suggests Brancaccio as the likely winner for this match.